Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive480% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 19:02
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 184
2-Core 364
111% 211 Pts
4-Core 714
8-Core 1,262
119% 988 Pts
64-Core 2,942
182% 2,942 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4077) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 177
Parallax 190
158% 187 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 140
Splatting 120
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3369 3420 3406 3426 2390 1664 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
480% Outstanding
Read 2,971
Write 3,415
Mixed 3,082
SusWrite 2,946
702% 3,103 MB/s
4K Read 82.5
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 120
394% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,557
DQ Write 1,065
DQ Mixed 1,259
954% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 480%
Great: 508%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1579 1677 1671 1669 1647 1498 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
363% Outstanding
Read 2622
Write 1,819
Mixed 1,791
SusWrite 1,624
439% 1,964 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 96.6
324% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,589
DQ Write 1,025
DQ Mixed 1,291
967% 1,302 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 363%
Great: 435%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 164 167 165 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 189
Write 158
Mixed 111
SusWrite 165
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1.1
74% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 1
2% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 39%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
424GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 325 325 324 324 324 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 474
Mixed 463
SusWrite 346
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 43.9
150% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 247
189% 258 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4W.16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 107
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 36.3
169% 59 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 35.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 150%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback