ZET WARD H125

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZET WARD H125  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 784
76% 622 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 150
Parallax 126
109% 136 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 104
Splatting 84.8
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6B.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 113 106 119 126 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 490
Write 339
Mixed 324
SusWrite 116
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 31.1
130% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 187
167% 249 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
857GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 169 168 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 158
Mixed 105
SusWrite 169
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 26.6
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 27.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WARD H125 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: ZET WARD H125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback