Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705GM
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200525
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '22 at 00:54
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 115 2-Core 216 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 485 54% 424 Pts	64-Core 643 40% 643 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1B4E) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5763 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.8% Average	Lighting 54.4 Reflection 84.2 Parallax 50.6 44% 63.1 fps	MRender 65.4 Gravity 60.9 Splatting 62.9 52% 63.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 768 684 160 148 134 66 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 1,254 Write 926 Mixed 808 SusWrite 327 184% 829 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 59.6 200% 69.2 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 691 DQ Mixed 222 251% 415 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 209%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60 12,460 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 596GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 84 85 84 84 84 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 80.5 Write 78.4 Mixed 46.8 SusWrite 83.1 53% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB 33,430 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 13.2 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	577x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	46x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	324x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	299x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	186x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	110x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	53x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	141x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	119x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16