Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '22 at 07:45
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 122 57% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 272 31% 242 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.47% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.47% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
128gb SSD 128GB 1,031 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 104 97 102 101 104 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.9% Below average	Read 278 Write 108 Mixed 116 SusWrite 106 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 13.2 53% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 20 DQ Write 34.6 DQ Mixed 20.3 17% 25 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 152%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 278GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 104 107 107 107 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 128 Write 117 Mixed 72 SusWrite 106 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 69%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 16GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 13GB free, PID 0306 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 40 Write 14.7 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 13.1 26% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.1 118% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 99U5474-025.A00LF 99U5584-007.A00LF 99U5595-005.A00LF 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.7% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 15.3 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	290x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	229x
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16