Casper NIRVANA NB C900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Casper NIRVANA NB C900 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER C900 001
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '22 at 19:39
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 113 2-Core 195 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 570 58% 472 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Clevo(1558 850A) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1123 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Lighting 31.1 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 31.2 25% 33.6 fps	MRender 34.5 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 20.2 23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,900 Write 1,883 Mixed 1,086 361% 1,623 MB/s	4K Read 66.7 4K Write 178 4K Mixed 92.3 314% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,008 DQ Write 858 DQ Mixed 962 713% 943 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 885GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 119 120 118 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 127 Write 90.3 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 118 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.7 201% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 1x8GB 727 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 11.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 12.1 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NIRVANA NB C900 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB C900

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	42x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	22x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	20x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
SA400M8120G 120GBKingstonBench 70%, 7,130 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $36Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	19x
CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 38%, 727 samples	4x
CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 40%, 460 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16