Biostar Hi-Fi A70U3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi A70U3P  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 10:37
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.5% Below average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 114
42% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 195
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.52% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 9.5
8% 11 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 9.9
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.52%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avexir S100 SERIES - 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP001JB1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 184
Write 213
Mixed 164
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 26.4
91% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 98.9
DQ Mixed 36.1
35% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
642GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 155 158 159 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 152
Write 148
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 156
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
210GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 83 83 82 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 60.4
Write 65.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 81.9
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB D3M4GL16B8 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 15.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.8
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi A70U3P Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi A70U3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback