Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 00:45
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 122
46% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 178
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 38.7
20% 30.4 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 20
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dataram S420 240GB SSD
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 267 340 402 355 387 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 445
Write 391
Mixed 318
SusWrite 355
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 20.3
97% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 33.8
69% 140 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 182 193 194 194 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 152
Mixed 87
SusWrite 191
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A Adata DDR3 1600 Adata DDR3 1600 16GB
1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.9% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3HP Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback