Lenovo 3254AG1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 3254AG1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3254AG1
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120508
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 21:51
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 121
53% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 371
38% 305 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 374 362 103 375 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 410
Write 305
Mixed 355
SusWrite 253
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 11.6
59% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 1
71% 165 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050M 500GB
455GB free
Firmware: AM001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 106 107 107 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 85
Write 99.9
Mixed 34
SusWrite 104
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3254AG1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3254AG1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback