Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G2020-$92 15,664 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	48% Average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 154 58% 100 Pts	4-Core 155 8-Core 150 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 0777) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.38% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.38% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 194 92 52 50 52 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 203 Write 148 Mixed 135 SusWrite 104 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 18.6 63% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 44.8 DQ Mixed 20.7 19% 29.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3010EC58E8F1333 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 6GB 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.6% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 14 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12.8 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	10x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x
HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 8,807 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	1x
99U5428-046.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 40%, 557 samples	1x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $91

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16