Lenovo 10FH000KUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10FH000KUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BC
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 21:35
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 217
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 578
57% 467 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 40
Parallax 36.8
30% 37.8 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 26.9
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S-1T00 1TB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 220 302 210 256 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 461
Write 403
Mixed 327
SusWrite 236
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 7.5
63% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 207
173% 251 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-131.A00G 1324 W642GU42J9266N8 9905701-131.A00G 9905701-131.A00G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FH000KUS Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FH000KUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback