Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V9.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V9.2
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 20:24
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 693
70% 569 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 872B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9729
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 48.5
Parallax 38.6
33% 42.5 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 27.4
28% 35.6 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW256G8 256GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 273 200 174 167 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 399
Mixed 411
SusWrite 196
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 56.1
181% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 204
174% 256 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
382GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 138 145 146 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 100
Write 146
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 142
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8266.C8FD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.1
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V9.2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback