Thunderobot PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemThunderobot PC  (all builds)
MotherboardTHUNDEROBOT H310CM-HDV
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 15:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 83.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 708
73% 589 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(107D 2771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 30
Parallax 29.5
26% 30.4 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 19.8
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CB2-8D128 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CN72101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 204 145 128 130 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
Read 437
Write 388
Mixed 397
SusWrite 147
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 20.6
69% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 123
116% 187 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BRBP1G816G16C2400 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 26.8
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 26.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Thunderobot PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $526
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback