ZET WARD H125

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZET WARD H125  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MAG B560M BAZOOKA (MS-7D18)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 11:44
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 790
76% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,016
63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 120
Parallax 122
107% 124 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 103
Splatting 87.1
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6B.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 135 116 74 52 166 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.1% Good
Read 208
Write 103
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 145
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 30.9
107% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 202
175% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 21.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WARD H125 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: ZET WARD H125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback