Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD5  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 18 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20090511
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 16 '22 at 06:53
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 132
61% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 257
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Nvidia(10DE 106F) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 26
Parallax 30.8
18% 26.2 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 25
23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT04K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 125 126 130 126 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 182
Write 132
Mixed 118
SusWrite 118
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 22.3
76% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 10.8
21% 40.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: 0953
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 117 124 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 110
Write 56.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 120
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
22GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 75 72 73 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 80.4
Write 78
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 73.4
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
336GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 59 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
44% Average
Read 95.4
Write 90.8
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 57.4
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
464GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 59 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 94.7
Write 93.1
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 57.4
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 60%
WD LM024 H External 1TB
4GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 6.5
Write 6.2
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 27.6
15% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
55% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback