Lenovo 80N5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80N5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Yoga 500-14IHW
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4030U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 91.5
49% 75.1 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 141
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940M
Legend(17AA 3821) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6097
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.97% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 7.8
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.53 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 113 74 38 18 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 417
Write 277
Mixed 289
SusWrite 94.8
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 20.8
94% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 183
152% 219 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 102%
Leef Surge 32GB
18GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.4
Mixed 8.4
12% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 8%
SMTLINK CardReader 64GB
44GB free, PID 0756
Operating at USB 1.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
0% 0 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80N5 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80N5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback