Gigabyte GA-B75MS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75MS  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171116
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 11:50
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 181
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 247
35% 258 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 68.5
58% 71.5 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 71
Splatting 56.5
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 37 41 64 51 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 8
Write 44.8
Mixed 11
SusWrite 40
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 11 11 13 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 19
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 12.5
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.3
228% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
17GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 10 10 10 9.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 17.9
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 10.6
24% 19 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.2
210% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
62.5% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 20.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75MS Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75MS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback