MB A78F2P-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMB A78F2P-M  (all builds)
MotherboardMB A78F2P-M
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 06:35
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A8-8650B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 117
45% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 178
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Elitegroup(1019 9A62) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 10.5
6% 8.77 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 8.1
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 355 363 206 198 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 385
Write 303
Mixed 326
SusWrite 274
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 12.6
89% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 25.1
60% 122 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
465GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 176 178 179 179 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 164
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 176
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KP4T2F-MIN 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 34%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78F2P-M Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: MB A78F2P-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback