HP EliteOne 800 G3 23.8-in Touch AiO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteOne 800 G3 23.8-in Touch AiO  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829B
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 21:01
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 229
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 440
57% 431 Pts
64-Core 429
26% 429 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 829B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.32% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 7.7
6% 7.17 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.7
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.32%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 326 326 323 242 326 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,593
Write 1,090
Mixed 662
SusWrite 307
202% 913 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 64.3
216% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 810
626% 849 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 188%
Great: 236%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
695GB free
Firmware: JF4OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 0 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 116
Write 60.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 10
46% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFD824A.M16FB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.4% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 24.2
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 25.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteOne 800 G3 23.8-in Touch AiO Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteOne 800 G3 23.8-in Touch AiO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback