MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 03:44
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 990
88% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,477
91% 1,477 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.2% Good
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 182
Parallax 116
50% 120 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 20
Splatting 107
84% 104 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613200WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2051 991 887 721 698 709 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 1,919
Write 2,498
Mixed 2,628
SusWrite 1,010
455% 2,014 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 72.6
286% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,455
DQ Write 1,258
DQ Mixed 1,343
1,010% 1,352 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 286%
Great: 494%
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
183GB free
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1331 977 979 981 944 698 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 1,630
Mixed 1222
SusWrite 985
297% 1,317 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 47.7
164% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 1,127
DQ Mixed 1,218
913% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 222%
Great: 296%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 184 202 199 203 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 152
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 195
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 40.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 41.7
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback