Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 22:23
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 77.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 898
84% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 146
Parallax 101
91% 119 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 128
Splatting 106
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
688GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 433 431 444 437 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,018
Write 2,137
Mixed 1,818
SusWrite 458
360% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68.5
231% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 786
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 706
522% 690 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 211%
Great: 347%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
164GB free
Firmware: 10.02E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 59 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 60
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 58.8
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
264GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 49 48 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
WD Game Drive 2TB
2TB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 124 125 126 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 116
Mixed 77
SusWrite 124
148% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.7
316% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 0.5
359% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 68%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID ffff
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.9 5.2 5 5.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.7
8% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 5%
WD Game Drive 2TB
354GB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 63 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 83.3
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 63.5
98% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOy CL16-20-20 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.4% Very good
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 32.3
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 31.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $148

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $901
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback