Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211130
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 22:16
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
79% 150 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 1,017
90% 762 Pts
64-Core 2,478
153% 2,478 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 175
Parallax 194
140% 180 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 152
Splatting 121
122% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
577GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 442 454 449 452 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 441
Mixed 323
SusWrite 447
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 38.8
134% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 288
236% 336 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
224GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1313 312 314 312 308 307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 2,087
Write 1480
Mixed 639
SusWrite 478
259% 1,171 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 55.1
216% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,120
DQ Write 762
DQ Mixed 759
616% 881 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 220%
Great: 236%
Lacie 2big RAID 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1352
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 234 235 234 236 235 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 222
Mixed 201
SusWrite 233
166% 224 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.6
1,658% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 139%
Great: 176%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
803GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 130 135 134 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 158
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 131
85% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 141 138 137 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 136
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 51.4
MC Write 54.8
MC Mixed 50.6
149% 52.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 20.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 131%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $716
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback