HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory18.6 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 18:17
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 162
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 438
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 91.1
Parallax 78.4
77% 88.1 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 81.9
Splatting 73.5
60% 73.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 1TB
573GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 124 123 118 123 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 130
Write 124
Mixed 126
SusWrite 121
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 23.4
74% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 92
DQ Mixed 96.2
72% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 120%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
1TB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 114 117 114 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 115
Write 89.2
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 115
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ40RF4BCFD-DJ-F 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 15.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback