Lenovo 3578CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3578CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130429
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 21:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 179
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 344
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 308C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM07L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 175 186 177 178 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.1% Average
Read 245
Write 160
Mixed 159
SusWrite 178
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 19.7
71% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 59.2
DQ Mixed 96.9
78% 113 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030ME68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3578CTO Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3578CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback