Lenovo M900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo M900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BC
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 211
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 597
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 121 71 83 63 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.5% Above average
Read 281
Write 193
Mixed 237
SusWrite 88.2
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 24.9
103% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 152
133% 195 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
396GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 130 134 132 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 135
Write 164
Mixed 112
SusWrite 133
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMA41GU6AFR8N-TFSC 0420 AM2P24HC8T1-BBMS 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 20.8
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M900 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo M900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback