| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Microtest H81N (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte H81N |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140709 |
| Uptime | 24.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 12 '22 at 16:13 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.3%
Good
|
75% 131 Pts
|
44% 344 Pts
|
23% 373 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
77.8%
Very good
|
75% 98 fps
|
84% 104 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 251 148 140 131 121 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
90% 400 MB/s
|
201% 71.6 MB/s
|
270% 362 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
53.3%
Above average
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
55% 72.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81N Builds (Compare 22 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Microtest H81N
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 4x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 4x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 3x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $269 |