TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Csl-computer T8186

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCsl-computer T8186  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 16:48
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 232
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 468
62% 467 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 77.7%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.24
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 22.1
13% 18 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 17
Splatting 14.1
12% 14 fps
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 12.8%
 Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8PS7512G 512GB
315GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 295 135 135 137 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 498
Write 395
Mixed 403
SusWrite 202
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 28.7
123% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 50
80% 151 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 78.3%
 Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
589GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 173 166 166 165 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 119
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 168
84% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 91.5%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 26.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 78.8%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical T8186 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Csl-computer T8186

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD  $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples11x
Ryzen 5 3400GAMD  $99Bench 68%, 93,718 samples2x
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega GraphicsAMDBench 70%, 3,488 samples2x
GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples9x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples1x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples1x
SSD
USNS8180S3512GJ 512GBKingstonBench 68%, 73 samples4x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples3x
Blue 250GBWD  $77Bench 79%, 26,761 samples2x
RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples6x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples3x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 37,374 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback