HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (100th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 0 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8742
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210903
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 19:40
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 242
89% 156 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 655
69% 552 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
HP(103C 8742) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7219
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.5% Average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 49.6
50% 54.6 fps
MRender 61.3
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 42.6
41% 50.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,199
Write 2,206
Mixed 1,282
422% 1,896 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 78.1
262% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 1,081
782% 1008 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 253%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 137 139 140 141 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FR Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 24.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk1xxx Builds (Compare 4,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-dk1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback