Pcware IPMH410G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPcware IPMH410G  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH410G
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200709
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 20:27
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 62.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 197
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 492
54% 424 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 64%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 23.8
14% 22 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 17
Splatting 22.3
17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200S610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 346 314 358 374 361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 341
Write 225
Mixed 295
SusWrite 347
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 29.4
125% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 181
168% 258 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
WH5SD8G8C3UAZ 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH410G Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware IPMH410G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback