Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101011
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateNov 15 '15 at 11:07
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 118
40% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 301
31% 252 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 46% Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 23.8
22% 24.2 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 27.3
19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 183
Write 150
Mixed 133
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 13
52% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 13.5
15% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 51%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
715GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 125
Write 129
Mixed 26.6
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.35
91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 74%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43
35GB free
Firmware: 8.01 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 34.2
Mixed 19.2
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.24
54% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 30%
WDC WD32 00JB-00KFA0 320GB
88GB free, PID 9001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 23.3
Mixed 14.2
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.41
72% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 20%
Typical GA-880GM-UD2H Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GM-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback