HP 700-230

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 700-230  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 19:20
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 184
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 355
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1189 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 27
Parallax 35.2
21% 29.3 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 20
20% 24.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X6002T 2TB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0317A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 27 2 2 1.9 2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 490
Write 402
Mixed 370
SusWrite 76.4
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 29.6
123% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 52.7
92% 175 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
536GB free
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 149 150 151 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 138
Write 100
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 150
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-230 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback