Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_V4200EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_V4200EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 15:45
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 244
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 671
66% 540 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 25.4
17% 23.2 fps
MRender 20.7
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1248 988 355 331 307 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,428
Write 1,229
Mixed 1,242
SusWrite 588
251% 1,122 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 68.4
242% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 945
DQ Mixed 920
693% 924 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 209%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Shenzhen Mic Electronics MG8A3200C12WP-SA 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.4% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 21.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 19.1
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_V4200EA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_V4200EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback