Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5105 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 47.2 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 146 48% 87.7 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 241 31% 236 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(1E50 800F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.06% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 7 Parallax 5.5 4% 5.67 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.1 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.06% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NS128GSSD330 128GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 263 342 276 190 171 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 300 Write 319 Mixed 284 SusWrite 246 65% 287 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 12.2 4K Mixed 4.5 57% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 75.6 DQ Write 68.3 DQ Mixed 17.8 28% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x4GB 26,293 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 24.4 MC Mixed 18.7 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.1 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	40x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	40x