Medion E14412

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion E14412  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION SF40CM
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 13:38
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 121
2-Core 201
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 293
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E39 A03B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SM8256GPKTCB4BECS-S11L2 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 111 77 78 76 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 407
Write 331
Mixed 288
SusWrite 118
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 29.7
110% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 194
170% 250 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E85-2666E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E14412 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E14412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback