TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '22 at 05:23
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 174
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 225
39% 275 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 55.6%
 Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 11D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 32.1
26% 31.8 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 20.7
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 25.3%
 Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 352 351 327 309 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 478
Write 367
Mixed 310
SusWrite 308
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 30.3
114% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 178
143% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 82.3%
 Great: 126%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
73GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 140
Write 130
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 71.5
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.6
248% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 61.4%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH CT8G4SFRA266.C16FG 16GB
2400, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 76.6%
 Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD

CPU
Ryzen 5 2500UAMDBench 49%, 61,910 samples18x
GPU
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples11x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples7x
SSD
860 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 100%, 26,055 samples6x
SD9SN8W256G1002 256GBSandiskBench 71%, 4,960 samples2x
Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GBCorsair  $120Bench 110%, 3,686 samples2x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples4x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH CT8G4SFRA266.C16FG 16GBHynixBench 79%, 8 samples3x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback