Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570ZD
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 14:35
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 157
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 398
44% 344 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 11D1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 31
Parallax 31.5
26% 31.6 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 20.8
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 312 319 329 284 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 486
Write 336
Mixed 302
SusWrite 289
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 27
110% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 176
142% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80%
Great: 126%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 68 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 142
Write 138
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 71.4
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
246% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH CT8G4SFRA266.C16FG 16GB
2400, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 27.2
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback