HP 750-280st

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 750-280st  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '22 at 02:21
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$25
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 169
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
PNY(196E 138F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4450 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 114
Parallax 130
104% 124 fps
MRender 161
Gravity 97
Splatting 83.8
90% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST2000DM001-1ER164 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X232112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 85 113 112 102 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 124
Write 119
Mixed 105
SusWrite 104
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 22.3
83% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 82.8
67% 94.9 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 118%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
647GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 95 102 100 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 96.2
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 99.3
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1321 24GB
2666, 2133, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.5% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 22.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-280st Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

System: HP 750-280st

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $436
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback