Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130218
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 21:05
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 95.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 497
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.6% Average
Lighting 58.6
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 80.3
48% 66.3 fps
MRender 60.2
Gravity 62
Splatting 44.3
44% 55.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 94 53 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 168
Write 109
Mixed 144
SusWrite 77.9
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 22
81% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 42.5
DQ Mixed 29.5
24% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
301GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 118 118 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 162
Write 168
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 116
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 0443 RMR1870EC58E9F1333 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback