Asus P6T WS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P6T WS PRO  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 18:54
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W5580
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 150
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 390
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 84.8
50% 69.5 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 45.9
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 665 255 262 253 253 246 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Team T253X6256G 256GB
142GB free
Firmware: U0503A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 231 231 233 233 235 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.2% Good
Read 249
Write 231
Mixed 232
SusWrite 232
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 24.6
103% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 51.8
79% 150 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T WS PRO Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T WS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback