Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 17:43
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 784
75% 619 Pts
64-Core 1,248
77% 1,248 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 173
Parallax 181
140% 175 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 154
Splatting 128
126% 159 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 813 458 261 237 255 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,573
Write 1718
Mixed 1,366
SusWrite 582
294% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 71.8
243% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 613
DQ Mixed 841
622% 829 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 211%
Great: 280%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
11GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 346
Mixed 303
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 19.1
80% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 13.4
35% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 161 162 162 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 150
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 161
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 108
Write 13.7
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 13
36% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2
152% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%
Corsair Force LS SSD 60GB
50GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 64 61 66 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 108
Write 65.6
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 65.4
100% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 8.4
1,137% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 34.7
DQ Mixed 13.9
1,726% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 122
Write 105
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 101
132% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 30.5
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 24.6
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $436
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback