Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211203
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 13:49
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$291
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 129
63% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 556
51% 428 Pts
64-Core 1,537
95% 1,537 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 124%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 12
8% 12.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 885E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 207
Parallax 200
182% 210 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 612 616 616 615 611 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,047
Write 1,655
Mixed 747
SusWrite 705
286% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 78.3
303% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 1,444
DQ Mixed 996
856% 1,253 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 279%
Great: 254%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
579GB free
Firmware: 614900WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4953 4781 1268 1241 1246 1242 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
568% Outstanding
Read 4,300
Write 4,608
Mixed 3,357
SusWrite 2,455
827% 3,680 MB/s
4K Read 89.7
4K Write 367
4K Mixed 124
489% 193 MB/s
DQ Read 2,349
DQ Write 2,015
DQ Mixed 2200
1,644% 2,188 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 568%
Great: 573%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
251GB free
Firmware: 613200WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,073
Write 4,333
Mixed 3165
792% 3,524 MB/s
4K Read 78.5
4K Write 316
4K Mixed 111
429% 168 MB/s
DQ Read 2,303
DQ Write 2,022
DQ Mixed 2,184
1,631% 2,170 MB/s
Poor: 264% Great: 573%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
365GB free
Firmware: 613200WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4432 4412 2376 840 948 1030 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
495% Outstanding
Read 3,093
Write 4405
Mixed 3,185
SusWrite 2,340
736% 3,256 MB/s
4K Read 78.4
4K Write 314
4K Mixed 111
428% 168 MB/s
DQ Read 2,373
DQ Write 2024
DQ Mixed 2,205
1,650% 2,200 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 495%
Great: 573%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4RL.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 37.6
110% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 23
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 101%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 3,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,290
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback