Hp-pavilion GN696AA-ABA a6202n

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion GN696AA-ABA a6202n  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NARRA2
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070716
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 22:02
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 67.2
36% 54 Pts
4-Core 66
8-Core 67.4
9% 66.7 Pts
64-Core 65.6
4% 65.6 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800
Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 4.5
7% 7.7 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 3.3
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 147 163 130 159 182 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.8% Above average
Read 231
Write 185
Mixed 188
SusWrite 153
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 34.2
112% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 44.7
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 55
46% 65 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 118%
ST98823A 80GB
4GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 21 22 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 22
Write 22.7
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 20.9
28% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GN696AA-ABA a6202n Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion GN696AA-ABA a6202n

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback