TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 17:07
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11500-$147
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 163
2-Core 322
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 906
92% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,149
71% 1,149 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 100%
 Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 590 (SLI Disabled)
Asus(1043 83A3) 1.5GB
CLim: 612 MHz, MLim: 855 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 16.2
14% 22.2 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 23.1
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 16.2%
 Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1715 1576 1127 241 314 329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,553
Write 2,005
Mixed 1,418
SusWrite 884
330% 1,465 MB/s
4K Read 62
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 91.2
317% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,592
DQ Write 1,212
DQ Mixed 1,242
972% 1,349 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑
This bench: 277%
 Great: 295%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
11GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.8 7.1 7.1 6.8 7.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 6.9
8% 7.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 4.42%
 Great: 8%
Toshiba USB DISK 8GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 7.8 7.8 7.4 7.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 7.4
8% 6.62 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 4.7%
 Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 35.9
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 33.1
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 112%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel  $115Bench 94%, 46,609 samples1,199x
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples1,132x
Core i5-11400Intel  $120Bench 94%, 24,459 samples1,099x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples1,094x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples658x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples380x
SSD
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples237x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples215x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples205x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples441x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples308x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples283x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback