Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	96.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H310MHP (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191230
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Memory 47.4 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 143 48% 86.6 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 498 47% 389 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.2% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 107 Parallax 120 96% 115 fps	MRender 162 Gravity 107 Splatting 98.8 97% 123 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CGM Virtual Disk 35606 12TB 3TB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 26 26 28 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.9% Very poor	Read 76.1 Write 28.5 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 27.4 10% 44.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 5.6 22% 8.63 MB/s	DQ Read 6.8 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 9.4 8% 10.3 MB/s

CGM Virtual Disk 0001 107GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 60GB free (System drive) SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 19 23 25 17 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 96.1 Write 39.6 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 17.5 36% 48.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 3.8 615% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%
CGM Virtual Disk 40726 12TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1.5TB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 25 25 29 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.1% Below average	Read 93.1 Write 28.9 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 26.9 34% 46.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 3.4 618% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 35%
CGM Virtual Disk 41238 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 660GB free SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 23 23 26 26 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 46.1 Write 40 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 24.7 27% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 3.8 615% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB 2,481 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 23.9 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 8.1 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 171 23% 171 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	361x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	291x
Core i5-9400Intel $155Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	134x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	94x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	67x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	36x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	31x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GBKingstonBench 82%, 4,742 samples	23x
BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 1x8GBUnknownBench 49%, 189 samples	16x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 5,242 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359