HP ProDesk 600 G5 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics78.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G5 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8596
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200427
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 14:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$237
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1,102
99% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,122
69% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
PNY(196E 1312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 99.6
Parallax 90.1
83% 97.2 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 90
Splatting 77.6
71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
776GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 401 388 360 388 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 375
Mixed 374
SusWrite 375
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 49.5
163% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G5 MT Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G5 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback