Lenovo 81W2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81W2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 03:53
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 189
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 471
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.26.11
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 19
11% 14.7 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 15
Splatting 10
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0105AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 472 515 384 216 217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 794
Mixed 846
SusWrite 374
180% 810 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 38
138% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 771
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 134
169% 322 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 133%
Great: 172%
Sandisk Extreme 55AE 500GB
224GB free
Firmware: 3001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 270 212 199 189 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 351
Write 305
Mixed 319
SusWrite 224
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 25.5
88% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 108
90% 134 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81W2 Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback