Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '17 at 22:48
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
77% 143 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 968
86% 729 Pts
64-Core 2615
162% 2615 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2952 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.53
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 215
Parallax 208
134% 196 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 193
Splatting 135
125% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 480GB
248GB free
Firmware: LSF031C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 469
Mixed 491
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 33.2
122% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 69.8
93% 168 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 95%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 2,069
Write 1,304
Mixed 1,595
367% 1,656 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 23.7
131% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 19
48% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 207%
Great: 210%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 75.9
Write 167
Mixed 158
102% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.28
98% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 103%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 132
Write 178
Mixed 143
114% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.43
173% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 57.3
MC Mixed 51.1
152% 53.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 133%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $829
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback