Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer C1_MB
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190521
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '22 at 16:02
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	3%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 94.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 224 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 773 70% 590 Pts	64-Core 970 60% 970 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 7.6 5% 7.63 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 10.5 8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q) 9,069 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Device(1A58 2000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1632 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Lighting 81.5 Reflection 113 Parallax 87.7 66% 94 fps	MRender 94.9 Gravity 86 Splatting 95.8 76% 92.2 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 69%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 535GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 410 650 488 500 501 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 984 Write 1,280 Mixed 960 SusWrite 510 210% 933 MB/s	4K Read 53.8 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 72.8 237% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1063 DQ Write 570 DQ Mixed 407 412% 680 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 311%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 22.9 82% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 25.2 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,070x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	470x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,452x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	599x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	400x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	822x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,765x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	291x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16