| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200107 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 04 '22 at 15:02 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | LTU-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.3%
Average
|
43% 74.1 Pts
|
41% 342 Pts
|
57% 927 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
30% 39 fps
|
28% 35.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 86 71 126 89 93 MB/s
|
65.6%
Good
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
212% 1.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GISB Crucial BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
71%
Very good
|
80% 28.1 GB/s
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
25% 157 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,081 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,467x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,308x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,008x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 952x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 736x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 654x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $354 |