Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 13:55
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 178
2-Core 349
110% 206 Pts
4-Core 692
8-Core 1,348
121% 1,020 Pts
64-Core 2,849
176% 2,849 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 243
Reflection 253
Parallax 500
198% 332 fps
Gravity 198
Splatting 287
221% 242 fps
Poor: 177% Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1556 934 568 589 585 592 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,382
Write 2,237
Mixed 1,491
SusWrite 804
386% 1,728 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 80.7
269% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,223
DQ Write 1,625
DQ Mixed 1,318
1,025% 1,389 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 291%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
680GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2266 2167 1172 1184 1176 1194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,466
Write 2,276
Mixed 1,736
SusWrite 1,526
449% 2,001 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 88.2
294% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,548
DQ Write 1,268
DQ Mixed 1,378
1,040% 1,398 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 346%
Great: 372%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
574GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 433 432 412 385 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 408
Mixed 364
SusWrite 410
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 37.9
130% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 201
153% 207 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
684GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 432 434 430 433 390 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 406
Mixed 408
SusWrite 424
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 48.9
161% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 201
154% 211 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
2TB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 434 434 433 434 435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 422
Mixed 390
SusWrite 434
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 47.5
158% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 199
154% 211 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M4C3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 43.8
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 40.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 130%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO Builds (Compare 3,962 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VIII DARK HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback