PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X9DA7/E (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9DA7/E |
Memory | 88 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140702 |
Uptime | 6.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 04 '22 at 06:43 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
|
68.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
684GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 228 230 229 227 230 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 234090WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 848 369 375 371 374 375 MB/s
|
155%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 12x8GB
12 of 16 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 5x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 4x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
NVS 510NvidiaBench 3%, 2,450 samples | 3x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 2x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 7% - Terrible | Total price: $149 |